To the editor,
At some point in the distant past, student government used to welcome the involvement of average students. If you were unhappy with the way things were going on campus, if you didn’t like the parking system or the financial aid process, if you didn’t think it was right that student leaders never did anything about the dead week or the sexual orientation referendums that the student body passed by overwhelming majorities, you could pick up an application in the student government office, find a running mate, collect enough signatures and run for student body president.
You may not necessarily have had a very good chance of being successful. But, it was your student government, and you could always put your money where your mouth was and try to make a difference at OU.
However, that all changed when Jason Robison got into Student Congress during the unpublicized, uncontested “elections” which occurred at the end of last year. He’s authored the “nobody but us” rule which says, in effect, that if you wanted to run for student body president this year you’d better have already been involved in student government because “nobody but us” can run anymore.
It’s a sad day when people who were never elected start telling the student body that they’re going to have to pick their leaders from among them because they’ve somehow gotten “dibs” on everything in the future by keeping the filing period a secret.
In the first five sentences of its constitution, the student association claims three times that students can participate in “any level” of student government. But, I ask you, is that really the case? If the average student can’t even hold an office, then does that office really even represent them anymore?
Nicholas Harrison
JD/MBA student
Comments
I really hope this Jason Robison gets recalled. What a joke. Protectivism at its worst.
From Concerned Student,
It is one of the greatest things to be involved in an organization. UOSA in particular, is a great place to learn not only about the issues that facing students and faculty/staff at OU, but also a place for you voice to be heard. Those that are currently involved volunteer their time to represent their fellow classmates on minimal to extreme issues and everyone is always welcomed in with open arms. Representatives’ and other positions in UOSA and not meant for power, but serve the students as liaisons, not only on the smaller scale of our campus, but also to the State of Oklahoma and sometimes on a nation level.
Having said that, the UOSA President has considerable shoes to fill especially with all they may promise in a campaign. Then all the tasks and meetings they must go through on a weekly basis to really be informed and prepared for another meeting. UOSA has many set rules and regulations on how to do each and every decision. There are forms, committees, and multiple other things that go on in Congress, the Senate, and Executive Branch that takes some considerable time to learn and understand the processes. I am personally not sure of this “nobody but us” rule, but I would feel better voting for a UOSA President that has more experience. I believe experience make the candidate more qualified. So if I had a choice between potentially a qualified person who has never been in UOSA, and someone who might be less qualified, but has had some experience in UOSA, then I would choose the latter because at least they have some experience with how things run.
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.